vortecfiero
New member
Some observations with EGR
Testing was done as follows
Stabilize temps
Launch in 1st
Launch in 2nd
Cruse at 60mph hammer it in 5th (2300 rpm)
Back off, Cruise, down shift to 3rd and hammer it
2800 lb fiero 5sp
Engine nat. asperated 262 1st generation Internally balanced (my first engine)
160 deg thermostat
ported stock heads, stock valves
vortec exhaust manifolds (2 drivers sides) 2.5 exhaust, turbo style muffler
9.5 to one compression, forged pistons
crane cam 218/218 @ 050 454 lift
Sunoco 94
Test 1
no egr
Edlebrock dual plane
Edlebrock 500 cfm carb tuned for performance
HEI centrif. advance dist. set 8 deg initial, all in at 3000 36 deg
any more timing would ping like crazy
awsum off the line ok mid range screamed to 6000 rpm
Test 2
switch to TBI Injection (Stock) ECM controlled
no EGR
timing set at 0
pinged once and awhile
ok off the line, ok mid range died at 5000 rpm
Test 3
same as test 2 but with with egr, no ping and ok with 4 deg initial timing
nice off the line, great mid range, ok to 5000rpm
Test 4
back to edlebrock intake, fuel @18 PSI + adapter for TBI, ECM controlled (but fooled with)
drilled intake for EGR Passage and Ford style (sort of ) adapter (but with TBI) vacumm controlled,
liked 6 deg initial, 38 deg all in @ 2500
ok off the line, OHMYGAWD midrange, screamed to 6000 rpm
so, in each case it would seem cylinder head/combustion chamber temps would go down
with the EGR connected which allowed a little more timing
looking at the SyTy set up I would think that reducing the same temps in the head would
be almost as beneficial
any comments ?
Testing was done as follows
Stabilize temps
Launch in 1st
Launch in 2nd
Cruse at 60mph hammer it in 5th (2300 rpm)
Back off, Cruise, down shift to 3rd and hammer it
2800 lb fiero 5sp
Engine nat. asperated 262 1st generation Internally balanced (my first engine)
160 deg thermostat
ported stock heads, stock valves
vortec exhaust manifolds (2 drivers sides) 2.5 exhaust, turbo style muffler
9.5 to one compression, forged pistons
crane cam 218/218 @ 050 454 lift
Sunoco 94
Test 1
no egr
Edlebrock dual plane
Edlebrock 500 cfm carb tuned for performance
HEI centrif. advance dist. set 8 deg initial, all in at 3000 36 deg
any more timing would ping like crazy
awsum off the line ok mid range screamed to 6000 rpm
Test 2
switch to TBI Injection (Stock) ECM controlled
no EGR
timing set at 0
pinged once and awhile
ok off the line, ok mid range died at 5000 rpm
Test 3
same as test 2 but with with egr, no ping and ok with 4 deg initial timing
nice off the line, great mid range, ok to 5000rpm
Test 4
back to edlebrock intake, fuel @18 PSI + adapter for TBI, ECM controlled (but fooled with)
drilled intake for EGR Passage and Ford style (sort of ) adapter (but with TBI) vacumm controlled,
liked 6 deg initial, 38 deg all in @ 2500
ok off the line, OHMYGAWD midrange, screamed to 6000 rpm
so, in each case it would seem cylinder head/combustion chamber temps would go down
with the EGR connected which allowed a little more timing
looking at the SyTy set up I would think that reducing the same temps in the head would
be almost as beneficial
any comments ?